Madeline Jane “Maddi” Kingsbury, 26, disappeared from Winona, Minnesota, on March 31, 2023, after she and Adam Fravel dropped their two young children at daycare. Her unexplained absence prompted extensive searches involving thousands of community members and multiple law-enforcement agencies. Digital records and surveillance evidence became central to reconstructing the morning she vanished. [Winona County Attorney](https://www.winonacounty.gov/DocumentCenter/View/4269/2023-06-09-Press-Release---State-v-Adam-Fravel---Charging)
On June 7, a Fillmore County sheriff's deputy found Kingsbury's body concealed near a rural road north of Mabel, Minnesota. Her body had been wrapped in a fitted sheet secured with tape and placed in a ditch near a culvert. A medical examiner described the cause of death as homicidal violence and testified that a towel tied around her head could have obstructed her breathing. [State v. Fravel](https://law.justia.com/cases/minnesota/supreme-court/2026/a25-0420.html)
Fravel, Kingsbury's former boyfriend and the father of her children, was charged with second-degree murder in June 2023. A grand jury later returned first-degree charges. At trial, prosecutors presented surveillance footage, phone and computer records, items from the Winona home that matched materials used to conceal the body, and evidence concerning domestic abuse. The defense argued that the case was circumstantial and challenged the state's account of where and how Kingsbury died. [Associated Press](https://apnews.com/article/e33595a3ac5d30546864f6df4377ecd6)
On November 7, 2024, a jury found Fravel guilty of first-degree premeditated murder, first-degree murder involving a past pattern of domestic abuse, second-degree intentional murder, and second-degree felony murder. On December 17, the court imposed the mandatory sentence for premeditated first-degree murder: life imprisonment without the possibility of parole. [Associated Press](https://apnews.com/article/288b30c541022ccc0d82ba2d32b2d1b3)
Fravel appealed directly to the Minnesota Supreme Court, challenging evidentiary rulings, the sufficiency of the evidence, and aspects of the prosecution's conduct. On April 29, 2026, the court affirmed the judgment. It found the evidence sufficient to establish premeditation and intent and concluded that the asserted errors did not entitle him to a new trial. [Minnesota Supreme Court](https://law.justia.com/cases/minnesota/supreme-court/2026/a25-0420.html)
The case is classified as solved because the convictions, life-without-parole sentence, and direct appellate affirmance establish legal responsibility. The account avoids unnecessary detail and treats the documented pattern of domestic abuse as trial evidence evaluated by the jury and appellate court.
